Politics is politics, but does anyone really think that the State Government’s recent announcement on selective statewide smoking bans around schools, kindergartens and playgrounds is in response
to Richard Fosters unworkable proposed CityWide blanket ban on smoking?
Richard Foster thinks so. (Twitter)
One step at a time.
One proposal is constructive and feasible. A Citywide ban is not.
Richard Foster’s proposed Citywide smoking ban has failed to receive support from his fellow city Councillors and has not been listed for discussion on the City Council’s agenda.
The City Council has the right to impose a selective smoking ban on Council owned property. It could even consider imposing a smoke-free zone as part of the Council’s on-street trading permit conditions.
A better approach is to install advisory signs in nominated public areas. “Please consider others and refrain from smoking in this area“.
A blanket ban beyond Council owned property should not be within the Council’s legislative jurisdiction.
HOWEVER it has highlighted concern for the need to provide State Government oversight and right of veto over Municipal laws.