Notes and suggestion on possible solutions to Melbourne’s Bicycle Network
Decision making process:
The oversight of the Bicycle plan is the responsibility of Greens Councillor Cathy Oake who is the City Council’s chair of the Transport portfolio.
The final sign-off and decision to proceed with the St Kilda bicycle plan and the Latrobe Street development were not decided by Council but made under delegation of the Council officers who claim that authority and agreement was made during the Council budget papers and the adoption of the Council’s transport strategy plan.
Final approval of the closure of the Princes Bridge lane and so called trail was not made in an open Council session but by delegation.
The adoption of a budget or the Council strategy plan should not be considered as having provided Council’s consent.
As Councillor Stephen Mayne stated last Tuesday was the first time the newly elected Council had to debate the issue of Bicycle lanes as distinct from the general issue of strategy plans and the like. And Tuesday’s meeting was discussing the idea of deferring implementation and and having the final decision brought before council for approval. The proposal for a review was rejected by the Council, even though it was evident that there was considerable public concern and opposition to the decision made under delegation.
Councillors discussed these issues in closed session but they were not debated in open session where the public are provide the opportunity to make a final submission and presentation in relation to any discussion to be made.
Why did the matter not come before Council for final approval? Planning permits application readily are discussed in open public committee before they are approved why not the bicycle plan?
Future final approval of future major projects and works MUST be decided by Council in open public session and not under delegation.
The existing bicycle lane should be removed and a Clardeon street design solution implemented.
Consideration should be given to establishing a shared bicycles lane with buses, taxis and motorcycles.
This is a disaster zone and in need of urgent comprehensive review. A review that should have taken place before proceeding with the Princes Bridge and St Kilda Road bike lanes
Latrobe Street should never have been chosen to install a segregated bicycle lane. 2.6 Million dollars misspent.
Council should consider and develop as alternative routes utilizing smaller streets such as Abbeckett and Franklin Street and eventually consideration will have to be made to remove the existing lane separation barriers.
On Street parking should be removed in the meantime to allow for improved traffic movements and protect commuters who are forced to park in the middle of the street with minimal protection of a safe environment
Princes Bridge should be closed to all unnecessary vehicular traffic BUT this should only be done with the provision of a suitable alternative river crossing East of Princes Bridge.
This would allow for installation of a bicycle lane on both sides of the bridge and the development of a public transport interchange/pedestrian precinct.
St Kilda Road
The bike lane should be widened and a Claredon Street chevron design bike lane installed the full length of St Kilda Road. This would require the consent of City of Port Phillip and Vicroads,. A chevron delineated lane would provide a safe environment for motorist parking, disabled and emergency vehicle access and cost much less then the expense of constructing a Copenhagen close lane barrier. More path for our buck
A 10Km speed limit should be implemented along Swanston Street between Princes Bridge and Victoria Street
The Bicycle lane in Swanston Street North of Victoria Street should be replaced with by Claredon Street chevron line delineation lane as recommended for St Kilda Road and Albert Street