Media Frenzy on a budget So-wing the seeds of discontent

Melbourne City Council has come under attack over its budget and division within the Council Chamber have become more apparent. The City of Melbourne is faced with a blow out in its financial position following John So wild unchecked spending spree. Now the roost has come home and John So must cut expenditure to pay for the party.

Melbourne City Council commissioned a now confidential $300,000 report by efficiency experts Ernst and Young.

Exact details of the report have been kept secret and away from ratepayers prying eyes. It is understood that the report has recommend major cuts in staff and expenditure, expected to generate up to 10 million dollars in savings, by cutting the fat.

The Council bureaucracy under John so has gotten fat and its now time for a crash diet and exercise to trim the fat.

The Council’s governance department in particular has come under scrutiny with the report identifying that some staff were employed, but were not really sure as to what their job entailed. The City Council had gone through a fast pace staffing growth spurt with senior executives redesigning their jobs to suit their life-style as opposed to the needs of the organization.

How the media preceived the So budget.

Herald Sun 24 May 2007

Mayor sharpens axe at Town HallMary Bolling
Herald Sun May 24, 2007 12:00am

LORD Mayor John So is swinging an axe over his staff, admitting a Melbourne City Council budget black hole will result in cuts.

The admission could put Cr So under investigation, with his comments potentially breaking a confidentiality agreement.

Cr So was on the back foot yesterday, after council’s big-spending budget included $4.2 million in undisclosed spending cuts, to keep the budget out of the red.

Quizzed about the cuts, the Lord Mayor was asked if Town Hall staff would be sacked.

“Yes, but there are places where staff can be relocated elsewhere,” he replied, and later qualified his statement. “Yes, we will have some staff redundancies, of course.”

The budget included the $4.2 million hole after a $300,000 efficiency review recommended ways to cut council fat.

The review was shown to councillors three weeks ago after they signed a deed of confidentiality promising not to reveal the contents.

But Cr So confirmed speculation that the review recommended staff cuts, potentially breaking the confidentiality agreement.

Last night, fellow councillor Peter Clarke said he understood the Lord Mayor and Deputy Lord Mayor Gary Singer were already being investigated over the comments.

“To make those comments were completely inappropriate,” Cr Clarke said.

“Council has to take action — there cannot be one law for all the councillors and another for the Lord Mayor.”

Council has already asked Victorian Local Government Minister Richard Wynne to investigate one alleged breach of the deed, after a report revealed contents of the review.

Any councillor found to have breached a confidentiality deed could be sacked or fined.

Yesterday, the Australian Services Union slammed Cr So for his comments, and branch secretary Brian Parkinson called for honesty.

“Rather than clarify the situation, John So has chosen to add to the stress and pressure on MCC staff by talking of redundancies in the media without keeping his workforce informed,” Mr Parkinson said.

“Everyone thinks their job is on the line.”

In this week’s budget, council actually allowed for funds to increase staff by 66, taking the total figure to 1076.

The details of the efficiency report and any planned sackings won’t be released publicly until next Wednesday.

Former mayor Kevin Chamberlin said the situation showed Cr So was unfit for his job and called on the State Government to sack councillors.

“John So is all about just getting re-elected, and he doesn’t care what the cost is,” he said.

Yesterday, Cr So said he was regularly congratulated on his work as Lord Mayor. Launching a talkfest about the future of Melbourne, he flagged interest in running for mayor again in council elections this year.

Rare revolt on budget as So confirms job cuts ahead
The Age May 24, 2007

Other Links:
Cash woes send council running to the meters
As you spend, So shall you reap?
Budget blow-out a ‘turn on’ for media man So
Council stamps feet over post office rent

A LACK of transparency and a “frivolous” plan to light the Tan running track around the Royal Botanic Gardens were the “last straw” for Melbourne City Council’s finance chairman Brian Shanahan.

This week, in an extraordinary vote of no-confidence in Lord Mayor John So, Cr Shanahan became the first finance chair at the city council for at least 20 years to vote against his council’s budget.

Cr Shanahan yesterday spoke out against Cr So’s plans to “ignore” a $4.2 million deficit in the council’s budget. This figure has been calculated by consultants Ernst & Young in a cost-cutting review of council operations.

Its report has been deemed confidential by chief executive David Pitchford and has not been released to the public. However, its recommendations will be relied on to find $4.2 million in savings to balance the council’s 2007-08 budget.

Cost-cutting methods could include sacking staff, asset sales or abandoning council projects.

The budget, released on Tuesday night, does not indicate where the necessary spending cuts will be made.

Mr Shanahan said his decision not to back the budget was not “made lightly”.

“It probably hasn’t happened before that a finance chair has voted this way, against their own council’s budget,” said Cr Shanahan, an ALP member who until recently supported the Lord Mayor in most council votes.

“But the public simply does not have enough information for us to set this budget in the way it should happen,” he said.

Cr Shanahan said that a stubborn insistence by Cr So and his team that a plan to light the Tan running track must proceed was the final straw.

“If we spend $1.6 million lighting that track, and not on saving the city’s trees, people will be able to run at night and have a view of dead trees,” he said.

Other significant items in the budget, revealed on Tuesday, include extending the operating times of city parking meters until 7.30pm on weekdays and Saturdays to raise extra money, dumping plans for a $7 million child-care centre at Docklands and increasing child-care fees by 10 per cent.

Cr Shanahan was to appear alongside the Lord Mayor on Tuesday afternoon to sell the annual budget but he withdrew mid-morning.

Cr So came under renewed pressure yesterday after saying there would be sackings at the council.

He was reluctant to answer questions on the topic but said on 3AW that “of course” there would be redundancies.

Fellow councillors jumped on the admission, calling on Local Government Minister Dick Wynne to investigate whether Cr So had revealed confidential information from the Ernst & Young report.

All nine councillors are already under investigation over the leaking of details from the report to The Age earlier this month.

Unions also snapped to attention after Cr So’s comment, demanding that the Lord Mayor reveal possible job losses.

“How many job losses is he proposing and where they will come from?” Australian Services Union secretary Brian Parkinson asked.

Rumours were circulating among staff that up to 400 jobs would go, Mr Parkinson said. “John So has let these rumours and unsubstantiated claims run rife for too long,” he said.

Asked whether he would run for lord mayor at November’s council election, Cr So said: “I’m running” but quickly changed this to say he was “considering” running.

Media Frenzy on a budget So-wing the seeds of discontent

Melbourne City Council has come under attack over its budget and division within the Council Chamber have become more apparent. The City of Melbourne is faced with a blow out in its financial position following John So wild unchecked spending spree. Now the roost has come home and John So must cut expenditure to pay for the party.

Melbourne City Council commissioned a now confidential $300,000 report by efficiency experts Ernst and Young.

Exact details of the report have been kept secret and away from ratepayers prying eyes. It is understood that the report has recommend major cuts in staff and expenditure, expected to generate up to 10 million dollars in savings, by cutting the fat.

The Council bureaucracy under John so has gotten fat and its now time for a crash diet and exercise to trim the fat.

The Council’s governance department in particular has come under scrutiny with the report identifying that some staff were employed, but were not really sure as to what their job entailed. The City Council had gone through a fast pace staffing growth spurt with senior executives redesigning their jobs to suit their life-style as opposed to the needs of the organization.

How the media preceived the So budget.

Herald Sun 24 May 2007

Mayor sharpens axe at Town HallMary Bolling
Herald Sun May 24, 2007 12:00am

LORD Mayor John So is swinging an axe over his staff, admitting a Melbourne City Council budget black hole will result in cuts.

The admission could put Cr So under investigation, with his comments potentially breaking a confidentiality agreement.

Cr So was on the back foot yesterday, after council’s big-spending budget included $4.2 million in undisclosed spending cuts, to keep the budget out of the red.

Quizzed about the cuts, the Lord Mayor was asked if Town Hall staff would be sacked.

“Yes, but there are places where staff can be relocated elsewhere,” he replied, and later qualified his statement. “Yes, we will have some staff redundancies, of course.”

The budget included the $4.2 million hole after a $300,000 efficiency review recommended ways to cut council fat.

The review was shown to councillors three weeks ago after they signed a deed of confidentiality promising not to reveal the contents.

But Cr So confirmed speculation that the review recommended staff cuts, potentially breaking the confidentiality agreement.

Last night, fellow councillor Peter Clarke said he understood the Lord Mayor and Deputy Lord Mayor Gary Singer were already being investigated over the comments.

“To make those comments were completely inappropriate,” Cr Clarke said.

“Council has to take action — there cannot be one law for all the councillors and another for the Lord Mayor.”

Council has already asked Victorian Local Government Minister Richard Wynne to investigate one alleged breach of the deed, after a report revealed contents of the review.

Any councillor found to have breached a confidentiality deed could be sacked or fined.

Yesterday, the Australian Services Union slammed Cr So for his comments, and branch secretary Brian Parkinson called for honesty.

“Rather than clarify the situation, John So has chosen to add to the stress and pressure on MCC staff by talking of redundancies in the media without keeping his workforce informed,” Mr Parkinson said.

“Everyone thinks their job is on the line.”

In this week’s budget, council actually allowed for funds to increase staff by 66, taking the total figure to 1076.

The details of the efficiency report and any planned sackings won’t be released publicly until next Wednesday.

Former mayor Kevin Chamberlin said the situation showed Cr So was unfit for his job and called on the State Government to sack councillors.

“John So is all about just getting re-elected, and he doesn’t care what the cost is,” he said.

Yesterday, Cr So said he was regularly congratulated on his work as Lord Mayor. Launching a talkfest about the future of Melbourne, he flagged interest in running for mayor again in council elections this year.

Rare revolt on budget as So confirms job cuts ahead
The Age May 24, 2007

Other Links:
Cash woes send council running to the meters
As you spend, So shall you reap?
Budget blow-out a ‘turn on’ for media man So
Council stamps feet over post office rent

A LACK of transparency and a “frivolous” plan to light the Tan running track around the Royal Botanic Gardens were the “last straw” for Melbourne City Council’s finance chairman Brian Shanahan.

This week, in an extraordinary vote of no-confidence in Lord Mayor John So, Cr Shanahan became the first finance chair at the city council for at least 20 years to vote against his council’s budget.

Cr Shanahan yesterday spoke out against Cr So’s plans to “ignore” a $4.2 million deficit in the council’s budget. This figure has been calculated by consultants Ernst & Young in a cost-cutting review of council operations.

Its report has been deemed confidential by chief executive David Pitchford and has not been released to the public. However, its recommendations will be relied on to find $4.2 million in savings to balance the council’s 2007-08 budget.

Cost-cutting methods could include sacking staff, asset sales or abandoning council projects.

The budget, released on Tuesday night, does not indicate where the necessary spending cuts will be made.

Mr Shanahan said his decision not to back the budget was not “made lightly”.

“It probably hasn’t happened before that a finance chair has voted this way, against their own council’s budget,” said Cr Shanahan, an ALP member who until recently supported the Lord Mayor in most council votes.

“But the public simply does not have enough information for us to set this budget in the way it should happen,” he said.

Cr Shanahan said that a stubborn insistence by Cr So and his team that a plan to light the Tan running track must proceed was the final straw.

“If we spend $1.6 million lighting that track, and not on saving the city’s trees, people will be able to run at night and have a view of dead trees,” he said.

Other significant items in the budget, revealed on Tuesday, include extending the operating times of city parking meters until 7.30pm on weekdays and Saturdays to raise extra money, dumping plans for a $7 million child-care centre at Docklands and increasing child-care fees by 10 per cent.

Cr Shanahan was to appear alongside the Lord Mayor on Tuesday afternoon to sell the annual budget but he withdrew mid-morning.

Cr So came under renewed pressure yesterday after saying there would be sackings at the council.

He was reluctant to answer questions on the topic but said on 3AW that “of course” there would be redundancies.

Fellow councillors jumped on the admission, calling on Local Government Minister Dick Wynne to investigate whether Cr So had revealed confidential information from the Ernst & Young report.

All nine councillors are already under investigation over the leaking of details from the report to The Age earlier this month.

Unions also snapped to attention after Cr So’s comment, demanding that the Lord Mayor reveal possible job losses.

“How many job losses is he proposing and where they will come from?” Australian Services Union secretary Brian Parkinson asked.

Rumours were circulating among staff that up to 400 jobs would go, Mr Parkinson said. “John So has let these rumours and unsubstantiated claims run rife for too long,” he said.

Asked whether he would run for lord mayor at November’s council election, Cr So said: “I’m running” but quickly changed this to say he was “considering” running.

Media Frenzy on a budget So-wing the seeds of discontent

Melbourne City Council has come under attack over its budget and division within the Council Chamber have become more apparent. The City of Melbourne is faced with a blow out in its financial position following John So wild unchecked spending spree. Now the roost has come home and John So must cut expenditure to pay for the party.

Melbourne City Council commissioned a now confidential $300,000 report by efficiency experts Ernst and Young.

Exact details of the report have been kept secret and away from ratepayers prying eyes. It is understood that the report has recommend major cuts in staff and expenditure, expected to generate up to 10 million dollars in savings, by cutting the fat.

The Council bureaucracy under John so has gotten fat and its now time for a crash diet and exercise to trim the fat.

The Council’s governance department in particular has come under scrutiny with the report identifying that some staff were employed, but were not really sure as to what their job entailed. The City Council had gone through a fast pace staffing growth spurt with senior executives redesigning their jobs to suit their life-style as opposed to the needs of the organization.

How the media preceived the So budget.

Herald Sun 24 May 2007

Mayor sharpens axe at Town HallMary Bolling
Herald Sun May 24, 2007 12:00am

LORD Mayor John So is swinging an axe over his staff, admitting a Melbourne City Council budget black hole will result in cuts.

The admission could put Cr So under investigation, with his comments potentially breaking a confidentiality agreement.

Cr So was on the back foot yesterday, after council’s big-spending budget included $4.2 million in undisclosed spending cuts, to keep the budget out of the red.

Quizzed about the cuts, the Lord Mayor was asked if Town Hall staff would be sacked.

“Yes, but there are places where staff can be relocated elsewhere,” he replied, and later qualified his statement. “Yes, we will have some staff redundancies, of course.”

The budget included the $4.2 million hole after a $300,000 efficiency review recommended ways to cut council fat.

The review was shown to councillors three weeks ago after they signed a deed of confidentiality promising not to reveal the contents.

But Cr So confirmed speculation that the review recommended staff cuts, potentially breaking the confidentiality agreement.

Last night, fellow councillor Peter Clarke said he understood the Lord Mayor and Deputy Lord Mayor Gary Singer were already being investigated over the comments.

“To make those comments were completely inappropriate,” Cr Clarke said.

“Council has to take action — there cannot be one law for all the councillors and another for the Lord Mayor.”

Council has already asked Victorian Local Government Minister Richard Wynne to investigate one alleged breach of the deed, after a report revealed contents of the review.

Any councillor found to have breached a confidentiality deed could be sacked or fined.

Yesterday, the Australian Services Union slammed Cr So for his comments, and branch secretary Brian Parkinson called for honesty.

“Rather than clarify the situation, John So has chosen to add to the stress and pressure on MCC staff by talking of redundancies in the media without keeping his workforce informed,” Mr Parkinson said.

“Everyone thinks their job is on the line.”

In this week’s budget, council actually allowed for funds to increase staff by 66, taking the total figure to 1076.

The details of the efficiency report and any planned sackings won’t be released publicly until next Wednesday.

Former mayor Kevin Chamberlin said the situation showed Cr So was unfit for his job and called on the State Government to sack councillors.

“John So is all about just getting re-elected, and he doesn’t care what the cost is,” he said.

Yesterday, Cr So said he was regularly congratulated on his work as Lord Mayor. Launching a talkfest about the future of Melbourne, he flagged interest in running for mayor again in council elections this year.

Rare revolt on budget as So confirms job cuts ahead
The Age May 24, 2007

Other Links:
Cash woes send council running to the meters
As you spend, So shall you reap?
Budget blow-out a ‘turn on’ for media man So
Council stamps feet over post office rent

A LACK of transparency and a “frivolous” plan to light the Tan running track around the Royal Botanic Gardens were the “last straw” for Melbourne City Council’s finance chairman Brian Shanahan.

This week, in an extraordinary vote of no-confidence in Lord Mayor John So, Cr Shanahan became the first finance chair at the city council for at least 20 years to vote against his council’s budget.

Cr Shanahan yesterday spoke out against Cr So’s plans to “ignore” a $4.2 million deficit in the council’s budget. This figure has been calculated by consultants Ernst & Young in a cost-cutting review of council operations.

Its report has been deemed confidential by chief executive David Pitchford and has not been released to the public. However, its recommendations will be relied on to find $4.2 million in savings to balance the council’s 2007-08 budget.

Cost-cutting methods could include sacking staff, asset sales or abandoning council projects.

The budget, released on Tuesday night, does not indicate where the necessary spending cuts will be made.

Mr Shanahan said his decision not to back the budget was not “made lightly”.

“It probably hasn’t happened before that a finance chair has voted this way, against their own council’s budget,” said Cr Shanahan, an ALP member who until recently supported the Lord Mayor in most council votes.

“But the public simply does not have enough information for us to set this budget in the way it should happen,” he said.

Cr Shanahan said that a stubborn insistence by Cr So and his team that a plan to light the Tan running track must proceed was the final straw.

“If we spend $1.6 million lighting that track, and not on saving the city’s trees, people will be able to run at night and have a view of dead trees,” he said.

Other significant items in the budget, revealed on Tuesday, include extending the operating times of city parking meters until 7.30pm on weekdays and Saturdays to raise extra money, dumping plans for a $7 million child-care centre at Docklands and increasing child-care fees by 10 per cent.

Cr Shanahan was to appear alongside the Lord Mayor on Tuesday afternoon to sell the annual budget but he withdrew mid-morning.

Cr So came under renewed pressure yesterday after saying there would be sackings at the council.

He was reluctant to answer questions on the topic but said on 3AW that “of course” there would be redundancies.

Fellow councillors jumped on the admission, calling on Local Government Minister Dick Wynne to investigate whether Cr So had revealed confidential information from the Ernst & Young report.

All nine councillors are already under investigation over the leaking of details from the report to The Age earlier this month.

Unions also snapped to attention after Cr So’s comment, demanding that the Lord Mayor reveal possible job losses.

“How many job losses is he proposing and where they will come from?” Australian Services Union secretary Brian Parkinson asked.

Rumours were circulating among staff that up to 400 jobs would go, Mr Parkinson said. “John So has let these rumours and unsubstantiated claims run rife for too long,” he said.

Asked whether he would run for lord mayor at November’s council election, Cr So said: “I’m running” but quickly changed this to say he was “considering” running.

City Junkets without Budget Council publishes next years budget but failed to provide details of expenses

Melbourne City Council will today published ts 2006-2007 budget papers. Whilst we have not had time to review the published documents (They were not available on the Council’s web site when we looked this morning)

The Herald Sun, who it seams has been given an advance copy, has reported that the City of Melbourne is seeking to install parking meters as a means revenue raising to help pay for the Junkets. Lurks and Perks of the City Council.

Unfortunately the City Council does not provide budget details for overseas trips, internal catering (free lunches and free booze) and the costs of the Lord Mayor and Deputy Lord Mayors Limousines. Councillor expenses are all met form the consolidated revenue.

Previous Auditors reports which continue to be ignore4d have recommended that Council set a budget for Councillor expenses and that a regular normal budget comparison be made each month. The City Council administration continues to refuse to provide this information or act responsibly.

If we find time we will resubmit our requests for financial details of Councilors travel expenses and cost of internal catering etc. Hopefully they will respond… but do not hold your breath the City Administration and the elected Council do not want to be held accountable let alone inform the public of were their money is going… Sad but true.

Drivers to help fund council’s trips
Jen Kelly
25may06

PARKING meters will be installed in Lygon St and more are proposed for Melbourne Zoo’s car park in a hip-pocket blow to families and shoppers.

The bid to suck an extra $800,000 a year out of drivers is revealed in the Melbourne City Council budget papers, to be released today.
It comes as the council — already under fire for its exotic junkets — lifts the annual budget for overseas programs and trips by about $400,000.

Traders are furious at the new parking fees, saying they will scare shoppers out of Lygon St and make zoo visits impossible for families.

The council expects to reap a record $54.2 million in parking fines and fees next financial year, budget papers show.

The documents show:

RATES will rise by 3.8 per cent on average.

RATEPAYERS will pay up to $1 million for the FINA world swimming championships at Rod Laver Arena next year.

AN extra $300,000 is expected to be spent on removing graffiti.

STAFF costs have soared 42 per cent to $74 million in just four years.

Councillors have agreed on meters in Lygon St, but those proposed for the zoo’s northern car park, next to Royal Park station, are still up for debate.

The zoo’s meters are predicted to raise $400,000 a year, with the revenue to subsidise the high cost of fixing the car park, which is in disrepair.

Lygon St meters are expected to generate another $400,000 a year.

Carlton Traders Association president Connie Paglianite said parking meters in Lygon St would be a disaster.

“It’s going to kill Carlton,” she said.

“The coffee’s not going to cost $3. It’s going to cost $5 or $6.”

Finance spokesman Cr Brian Shanahan it was surprising meters had not already been installed.

“You’ve got parking meters in Errol St (in North Melbourne). Why not in Lygon St?” he said.

Ms Paglianite, also a member of voluntary support group Friends of the Zoo, said parking meters at the zoo would make it hard on families.

“It’s hard enough trying to find car parking, let alone paying for it on top of that,” she said.

Cr Peter Clarke criticised parts of the budget and said funding to the swimming championships should be cut from $1 million to $700,000.

“We need to be funding local projects that are important to the ratepayers and residents,” he said.

Cr Clarke said the additional $400,000 for overseas travel and international links, especially with Milan, Delhi and China, should be dumped.

“I think sometimes local government can get too excited about its capacity to generate international trade.”

Cr Clarke said a lot more money should be spent on child care and other local priorities.

Parking fines in 2006-07 are expected to reap almost $28 million while parking fees are hoped to earn $26 million.

Total revenue is expected to be $245 million, with $127.7 million in rates.

The budget papers are expected to be approved at a council meeting today.

City Junkets without Budget Council publishes next years budget but failed to provide details of expenses

Melbourne City Council will today published ts 2006-2007 budget papers. Whilst we have not had time to review the published documents (They were not available on the Council’s web site when we looked this morning)

The Herald Sun, who it seams has been given an advance copy, has reported that the City of Melbourne is seeking to install parking meters as a means revenue raising to help pay for the Junkets. Lurks and Perks of the City Council.

Unfortunately the City Council does not provide budget details for overseas trips, internal catering (free lunches and free booze) and the costs of the Lord Mayor and Deputy Lord Mayors Limousines. Councillor expenses are all met form the consolidated revenue.

Previous Auditors reports which continue to be ignore4d have recommended that Council set a budget for Councillor expenses and that a regular normal budget comparison be made each month. The City Council administration continues to refuse to provide this information or act responsibly.

If we find time we will resubmit our requests for financial details of Councilors travel expenses and cost of internal catering etc. Hopefully they will respond… but do not hold your breath the City Administration and the elected Council do not want to be held accountable let alone inform the public of were their money is going… Sad but true.

Drivers to help fund council’s trips
Jen Kelly
25may06

PARKING meters will be installed in Lygon St and more are proposed for Melbourne Zoo’s car park in a hip-pocket blow to families and shoppers.

The bid to suck an extra $800,000 a year out of drivers is revealed in the Melbourne City Council budget papers, to be released today.
It comes as the council — already under fire for its exotic junkets — lifts the annual budget for overseas programs and trips by about $400,000.

Traders are furious at the new parking fees, saying they will scare shoppers out of Lygon St and make zoo visits impossible for families.

The council expects to reap a record $54.2 million in parking fines and fees next financial year, budget papers show.

The documents show:

RATES will rise by 3.8 per cent on average.

RATEPAYERS will pay up to $1 million for the FINA world swimming championships at Rod Laver Arena next year.

AN extra $300,000 is expected to be spent on removing graffiti.

STAFF costs have soared 42 per cent to $74 million in just four years.

Councillors have agreed on meters in Lygon St, but those proposed for the zoo’s northern car park, next to Royal Park station, are still up for debate.

The zoo’s meters are predicted to raise $400,000 a year, with the revenue to subsidise the high cost of fixing the car park, which is in disrepair.

Lygon St meters are expected to generate another $400,000 a year.

Carlton Traders Association president Connie Paglianite said parking meters in Lygon St would be a disaster.

“It’s going to kill Carlton,” she said.

“The coffee’s not going to cost $3. It’s going to cost $5 or $6.”

Finance spokesman Cr Brian Shanahan it was surprising meters had not already been installed.

“You’ve got parking meters in Errol St (in North Melbourne). Why not in Lygon St?” he said.

Ms Paglianite, also a member of voluntary support group Friends of the Zoo, said parking meters at the zoo would make it hard on families.

“It’s hard enough trying to find car parking, let alone paying for it on top of that,” she said.

Cr Peter Clarke criticised parts of the budget and said funding to the swimming championships should be cut from $1 million to $700,000.

“We need to be funding local projects that are important to the ratepayers and residents,” he said.

Cr Clarke said the additional $400,000 for overseas travel and international links, especially with Milan, Delhi and China, should be dumped.

“I think sometimes local government can get too excited about its capacity to generate international trade.”

Cr Clarke said a lot more money should be spent on child care and other local priorities.

Parking fines in 2006-07 are expected to reap almost $28 million while parking fees are hoped to earn $26 million.

Total revenue is expected to be $245 million, with $127.7 million in rates.

The budget papers are expected to be approved at a council meeting today.

City Junkets without Budget Council publishes next years budget but failed to provide details of expenses

Melbourne City Council will today published ts 2006-2007 budget papers. Whilst we have not had time to review the published documents (They were not available on the Council’s web site when we looked this morning)

The Herald Sun, who it seams has been given an advance copy, has reported that the City of Melbourne is seeking to install parking meters as a means revenue raising to help pay for the Junkets. Lurks and Perks of the City Council.

Unfortunately the City Council does not provide budget details for overseas trips, internal catering (free lunches and free booze) and the costs of the Lord Mayor and Deputy Lord Mayors Limousines. Councillor expenses are all met form the consolidated revenue.

Previous Auditors reports which continue to be ignore4d have recommended that Council set a budget for Councillor expenses and that a regular normal budget comparison be made each month. The City Council administration continues to refuse to provide this information or act responsibly.

If we find time we will resubmit our requests for financial details of Councilors travel expenses and cost of internal catering etc. Hopefully they will respond… but do not hold your breath the City Administration and the elected Council do not want to be held accountable let alone inform the public of were their money is going… Sad but true.

Drivers to help fund council’s trips
Jen Kelly
25may06

PARKING meters will be installed in Lygon St and more are proposed for Melbourne Zoo’s car park in a hip-pocket blow to families and shoppers.

The bid to suck an extra $800,000 a year out of drivers is revealed in the Melbourne City Council budget papers, to be released today.
It comes as the council — already under fire for its exotic junkets — lifts the annual budget for overseas programs and trips by about $400,000.

Traders are furious at the new parking fees, saying they will scare shoppers out of Lygon St and make zoo visits impossible for families.

The council expects to reap a record $54.2 million in parking fines and fees next financial year, budget papers show.

The documents show:

RATES will rise by 3.8 per cent on average.

RATEPAYERS will pay up to $1 million for the FINA world swimming championships at Rod Laver Arena next year.

AN extra $300,000 is expected to be spent on removing graffiti.

STAFF costs have soared 42 per cent to $74 million in just four years.

Councillors have agreed on meters in Lygon St, but those proposed for the zoo’s northern car park, next to Royal Park station, are still up for debate.

The zoo’s meters are predicted to raise $400,000 a year, with the revenue to subsidise the high cost of fixing the car park, which is in disrepair.

Lygon St meters are expected to generate another $400,000 a year.

Carlton Traders Association president Connie Paglianite said parking meters in Lygon St would be a disaster.

“It’s going to kill Carlton,” she said.

“The coffee’s not going to cost $3. It’s going to cost $5 or $6.”

Finance spokesman Cr Brian Shanahan it was surprising meters had not already been installed.

“You’ve got parking meters in Errol St (in North Melbourne). Why not in Lygon St?” he said.

Ms Paglianite, also a member of voluntary support group Friends of the Zoo, said parking meters at the zoo would make it hard on families.

“It’s hard enough trying to find car parking, let alone paying for it on top of that,” she said.

Cr Peter Clarke criticised parts of the budget and said funding to the swimming championships should be cut from $1 million to $700,000.

“We need to be funding local projects that are important to the ratepayers and residents,” he said.

Cr Clarke said the additional $400,000 for overseas travel and international links, especially with Milan, Delhi and China, should be dumped.

“I think sometimes local government can get too excited about its capacity to generate international trade.”

Cr Clarke said a lot more money should be spent on child care and other local priorities.

Parking fines in 2006-07 are expected to reap almost $28 million while parking fees are hoped to earn $26 million.

Total revenue is expected to be $245 million, with $127.7 million in rates.

The budget papers are expected to be approved at a council meeting today.